Russian Drunk Tank Driver For Mac



Drunk

Driver manual russian video dailymotion, drunk tank driver fail violent crash! Ukraine drivers are worst than russian drivers. Jersey drivers manual translated russian, jersey drivers manual translated russian. An unfortunate incident. Discussion in 'Current Events' started by mmzplanet, Jun 19, 2006. Then I think a sensible punishment is an impounded car and a night in the drunk tank to sober up (or possibly just a ride home instead). 'I'd rather my driver be drunk than fall asleep at the wheel-- a slow reaction time is better than. The Return of the Drunk Tank: How Russia Is Preparing for the World Cup As Russia braces for an influx of foreign football fans this year, Soviet-style drunk tanks are making a comeback.

Russian Drunk Tank Driver

In one psych class I took, we watched a brief snippet of a TV special about drunk drivers. The ironic part? Many juries give much more lenient punishments than what could be doled out because they attest to understanding what it's like to 'have a drink or two and think you're okay to drive.' It's really quite sad. And Silencio, I think you're right. They (drunk drivers) probably are a lot more relaxed and could receive lesser impact because of that.

But keep in mind, cars are designed w/ the driver seat being the most protected. That's another factor. First, this is a terrible tragedy and I hope the driver (if she was drunk) spends the rest of her life in prison. With that being said, I'd like to share my opinion on drunk driving. Most people will find this offensive. I'll probably be personally attacked, banned from the forum, etc.

People might stop me on the street and pelt me with rotten fruits and vegetables, but I've gotta say it. I don't think drunk driving is morally wrong.

It is stupid and dangerous and I think the punishment should be severe if you damage someone's property or injure someone while drunk. If, on the other hand, the police pull you over for a traffic offense (speeding, swerving, etc.) and discover that you're legally drunk (but you haven't caused any sort of accident) then I think a sensible punishment is an impounded car and a night in the drunk tank to sober up (or possibly just a ride home instead). Where I live, if you have two beers in an hour and get behind the wheel and are 'caught' and convicted you are subject to a mandatory 10 day jail sentence and probably around $5000 in fines. That is absolutely insane.

To me it seems like you're being punished for a 'pre-crime' like in 'Minority Report'. You haven't actually had an accident or hurt anyone, but you've increased the likelihood by some amount which is in itself somehow a crime. Maybe gun owners should be forced to pick up trash on the side of the highway since they've increased the likelihood of someone being shot. I've seen statistics that say more accidents are caused by drowsiness than drunkenness yet I've never heard of anyone being charged with driving while sleepy. They're both equally preventable. Could there be an underlying social agenda?

(Or maybe it's just harder to prove drowsiness so it's still legal. For now.) In the large metro area where I live there were on the order of 100 DUIs per year in the early 80's. Now there are several thousand per year. (Sorry, I'm too lazy to look up the numbers again).

Are there more irresponsible drunks per capita? Or have lawyers and politicians discovered it's very profitable to criminalize the populace? I wouldn't be surprised to find out that many of the members of MADD were defense attorneys. I'll stop ranting now, but for the record: -- I've never had a DUI (or owned a gun) -- I generally get a good nights sleep -- One of my friends was killed by a drunk driver in 1998 Thanks for listening. Click to expand.The body doesn't enter shock when it is intoxicated enough. Shock is a major killer after accidents-- not shock as in 'oh, wow!'

But the kind of shock where the body has suffered so much damage that it enters various methods of survival. [Sidenote: Ecstacy works by tricking your body into thinking that it is dying, and the body summons emergency energy to make a last-ditch effort to survive.] Driving while drunk means that the body doesn't enter shock, and is more receptive to the emergency personnel who arrive on-scene to take care of the injured. Click to expand.Vehicular manslaughter is the charge for when someone dies when they are hit by a vehicle.

Vehicular assault is when someone is hit by a car, but are not killed. A DUI charge can be applied to any foreign substance that impairs the body's ability to think.

It just so happens that most illegal substances impair the body's ability to think. And I agree, both are equally preventable. They both should not be allowed to happen. But just because people drive when they are tired does not mean that they should be allowed to drive while drunk. (Two wrongs don't make a right.).